A Canadian Press Story on Harper's Cuts

My friend Angie just sent me this story with the message "This makes my heart hurt."
Mine too.

By Jennifer Ditchburn

OTTAWA (CP) - The federal Conservative government says it will nolongerfund women's groups that do advocacy, lobbying or general research, leaving some to wonder what's left. The drastic change to the mandate and operation of Status of WomenCanada also drops the word "equality" when listing the agency's goals.

Previous objectives such as helping women's organizations participate in the public policy process and increasing the public's understanding of women's equality issues have been eliminated from government literature. Organizations that receive funding from the Trudeau-era agency were stunned.

"When you look at this Conservative government's policy it's like, 'Be good girls, be quiet.' It's shocking really," said Monica Lysack of the ChildCare Advocacy Association of Canada. Groups initially thought the agency's core program had escaped the axeduring a government-wide spending review announced last week, when only the administrative side of Status of Women Canada was cut. But they were told this week by Status of Women Minister Bev Oda that they would no longer be able to receive funding for projects that involved advocacy work, lobbying of the government or general research, as part of new terms and conditions for grants.

Oda was not available for comment Wednesday. But last week she made reference to the changes in the Commons. "The new terms and conditions are consistent with our commitment toaccountability and value for money," Oda said. "Canadian women know the value of a dollar. They know what good use of hard earned money means." The changes are consistent with program cuts the government made to policy branches and advisory committees in several departments.

Government watchers say it's indicative of a move away from "government-funded lobbying," in favour of results-oriented projects. Alia Hogben, executive director of the Canadian Council of the Muslim Women, argues without the funding the government provided her group, it would never have successfully struck down the use of Muslim shariah law in Ontario family court cases.

"That makes it very difficult, because if you don't lobby and you don'tadvocate, you're not going to make systemic changes," said Hogben. "A majority of us are new immigrants, we don't know all the systems, we have to struggle with adaptation . . . to say we're going to get money, or any large sums of money to do this work is just not reasonable."

The changes were welcomed by REAL Women Canada, a socially conservative group that has been advocating the total elimination of the federal agency, which it considers irrelevant to average Canadian women. "If a group can't support itself and its lobbying activities across the country, then it just isn't a grassroots organization and shouldn't be funded by the taxpayer," said vice-president Gwendolyn Landolt. "You have fundraisers and you earn money, you stand on your own two feet, you don't look for government handouts."

Also in the new terms and conditions for grants is a general statement of objectives for the women's program. The last document, published in 1993, said the program supported organizations that sought to "advance equality for women by addressing women's economic, social, political and legal situation." It also had a list of four other key objectives that included women's involvement in the decision-making or public policy process. The new, shorter stated objective is to "facilitate women's participation in Canadian society by addressing their economic, social and cultural situation through Canadian organizations."

Michele Asselin, president of la Federation des femmes du Quebec - the largest women's organization in the province - said Canadians expect their government do what's necessary to uphold Charter equality rights, and sometimes that includes funding outside groups to raise issues. "It's fundamental to Canadian democracy because all groups and lobbyists aren't all equal. There has to be financing that supports independent groups that can question and analyze and give different perspectives to government," said Asselin. "That's part of a democratic society to finance groups that defend rights."